<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monopoly to no longer include paper money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kickflop.net/blog/2006/07/25/monopoly-to-no-longer-include-paper-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kickflop.net/blog/2006/07/25/monopoly-to-no-longer-include-paper-money/</link>
	<description>eating bandwidth since 1992</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.kickflop.net/blog/2006/07/25/monopoly-to-no-longer-include-paper-money/comment-page-1/#comment-82785</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 20:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kickflop.net/blog/?p=247#comment-82785</guid>
		<description>I don't know.  I kind of feel the same about this that I do about the special editions of the original Star Wars trilogy.  As long as I can always get the original, the new version will be a nice change of pace.  Especially if they actually incorporate credit ratings and debt/income ratios and...

Okay, maybe that's a little too much like real life.

Anyway, if they just completely nix the classic version... Well, I guess I'm just glad I got that nice anniversary edition while I had the chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know.  I kind of feel the same about this that I do about the special editions of the original Star Wars trilogy.  As long as I can always get the original, the new version will be a nice change of pace.  Especially if they actually incorporate credit ratings and debt/income ratios and&#8230;</p>
<p>Okay, maybe that&#8217;s a little too much like real life.</p>
<p>Anyway, if they just completely nix the classic version&#8230; Well, I guess I&#8217;m just glad I got that nice anniversary edition while I had the chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coworker Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.kickflop.net/blog/2006/07/25/monopoly-to-no-longer-include-paper-money/comment-page-1/#comment-82062</link>
		<dc:creator>Coworker Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kickflop.net/blog/?p=247#comment-82062</guid>
		<description>As much as I dislike carrying paper money and a pocket full of metal, I don't see why a classic board game needs to change with the times.

Although, if the US Mint would allow us to print our own money like Hasbro (http://www.hasbro.com/monopoly/pl/page.treasurechest/dn/default.cfm) I might be pursuaded to change my mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I dislike carrying paper money and a pocket full of metal, I don&#8217;t see why a classic board game needs to change with the times.</p>
<p>Although, if the US Mint would allow us to print our own money like Hasbro (http://www.hasbro.com/monopoly/pl/page.treasurechest/dn/default.cfm) I might be pursuaded to change my mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
